Meds

January 31, 2010

How long does hepatitis B vaccine protection last?

Filed under: Health — Tags: , — admin @ 2:53 am

The hepatitis B vaccine – given to protect against infection by a virus that can cause severe liver damage and cancer – may protect for more than two decades, according to a new study.

In 1981, Dr. Brian J. McMahon, from the Alaska Native Medical Center, Anchorage, and his colleagues gave more than 1500 Alaska Native adults and children over age 6 months three doses of hepatitis B vaccine. Before the hepatitis B vaccine was licensed for U.S. use in 1981, as many as one in 12 Alaskan Natives were infected.

In 2003, the team checked with almost 500 of those given the shots and had a response to them at the time to see who was still showing evidence of an immune system response. Blood tests found that more than half – 60 percent — were still considered immune to the virus.

To test whether the other 40 percent were immune, they were given a booster dose of the vaccine, to simulate infection. Most of those people – more than 80 percent – showed a response.

Overall, the researchers estimate that more than 90 percent of the original group was protected. There were no long-term hepatitis B infections in the group, which also suggests a high level of protection, they note in a report in the Journal of Infectious Diseases.

They conclude, “in light of the strong evidence we present here, hepatitis B vaccine booster doses are not currently indicated.”

January 25, 2010

Nicotine Patch Plus Lozenge Best for Quitting Smoking

Filed under: Health — Tags: , — admin @ 2:51 am

The first head-to-head comparison of different quit-smoking products finds that a nicotine patch combined with a nicotine lozenge had the most success.

More than other methods, including antidepressants, this combination best mimics the actual highs and lows of smoking to help smokers kick their habit, experts said.

“The study shows that, yes, one therapy came out on top, the patch and the lozenge [together],” said Dr. Jonathan H. Whiteson, co-director of the Joan and Joel Smilow Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention Center at NYU Langone Medical Center in New York City.

“The reasoning behind it is that the patch supplies a steady supply of nicotine replacement and the lozenges give a boost of nicotine which you can use when you have an extra craving. It gives people control,” said Whiteson, who was not involved in the research.

“If you combine these different types of nicotine replacement you’re going to get the best bang for your buck,” added Megan E. Piper, lead author of the new study and an assistant professor at the Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention at the University of Wisconsin, Madison. “But also remember that in this study people got a lot of counseling. It was that combination that resulted in a 40 percent quit rate [at six months out].”

In fact, coupling the patch with the lozenge was the only intervention that performed better than a placebo, reported the study, which appears in the November issue of the Archives of General Psychiatry.

The study adds insight to a field that’s long suffered from too little research. “As each medication comes out, it is tested against a placebo,” but not against other methods, Piper explained. “There just hasn’t been the funding or the availability of a program to do something like that.”

This research was funded by the U.S. National Institutes of Health. Medication was provided free by drug maker GlaxoSmithKline. Several of the study authors reported financial ties to different pharmaceutical companies.

For this study, 1,504 adults who had smoked at least half a pack a day for the past six months and wanted to quit were randomly assigned to a placebo or one of five different quit-smoking interventions: nicotine lozenge, nicotine patch, bupropion (Wellbutrin, an antidepressant), nicotine patch plus nicotine lozenge, and bupropion plus nicotine lozenge. All groups received six individual counseling sessions with a case manager.

The nicotine patch, which has been available for more than two decades, is currently the most widely used pharmacotherapy to help people quit smoking.

However, only the combination of the nicotine patch and the lozenge performed significantly better than placebo six months after the person smoked their last cigarette, the team found.

People taking the patch-lozenge combination were also more likely to have sworn off cigarettes after one week and were more likely to have attained one full day without smoking, the researchers said.

The 40 percent (at six months) success rate reported here will decline as time goes on, Whiteson noted. He added, however, that in the smoking cessation arena, “even the 30 percent range is very good.”

Another expert said the study raised some key concerns. “The question is, how many of them had to continue on the lozenge in order to stay off cigarettes? I always tell people not to do the lozenge alone because it mimics the very thing that smoking does, which gives you a spike. Then, when you reach a trough, you pick up a lozenge — or cigarette,” said Dr. Len Horovitz, a pulmonary specialist with Lenox Hill Hospital in New York City. “Once they stopped everything, could they do without the spikes and troughs [of the lozenge], which mimics physiologically everything the cigarette is doing? Smoking is a two-pronged problem. There’s nicotine dependence and a behavioral aspect to it.”

Dr. Elliot Wineburg, assistant clinical professor of psychiatry at Mount Sinai School of Medicine in New York City, felt the study suffered from some limitations, namely lack of individual attention to individual smokers’ habits.

“The authors said that they gave the patients lozenges according to the company’s [instructions],” he said. But this doesn’t take into account how much people smoke or how strong their cigarettes are. “They don’t even look into the amount of nicotine a person takes.”

January 18, 2010

NIH-Supported Trial to Study Testosterone Therapy in Older Men

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: — admin @ 2:47 am

Low serum testosterone may contribute to a number of problems affecting older men, including decreased ability to walk, loss of muscle mass and strength, decreased vitality, decreased sexual function, impaired cognition, cardiovascular disease and anemia. While testosterone normally decreases with age, in some men, low levels of testosterone may contribute to these debilitating conditions. A new national clinical trial will test whether these conditions can be favorably affected by testosterone therapy.

The National Institute on Aging (NIA), part of the National Institutes of Health, today announced the start of a large-scale clinical trial to evaluate the effect of testosterone therapy on older men. Led by the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine and conducted at 12 sites across the nation, the Testosterone Trial will involve 800 men age 65 and older with low testosterone levels.

“We know that, as men get older, a significant proportion are unable to carry out activities of daily living and experience decreased physical and cognitive function and decreased independence,” said NIA Director Richard J. Hodes, M.D. “We do not know the extent to which low levels of testosterone may contribute to these conditions.”

A 2004 report by the Institute of Medicine, “Testosterone and Aging: Clinical Research Directions,” noted several important unanswered questions about the effects of testosterone therapy. The NIA is aiming to answer these questions by testing the effectiveness of testosterone therapy in older men with low testosterone levels and one of the following conditions: impaired walking, low vitality, sexual or cognitive dysfunction. A key consideration is the use of testosterone as a therapy for certain conditions, rather than as a preventive measure.

The NIA is the primary source of support for this trial. Additional funding is being provided by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI); the National Institute on Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS); the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) and Solvay Pharmaceuticals, which is also supplying the study drug.

The Testosterone Trial will include five separate studies. At each of the 12 sites, men 65 and older with low serum testosterone and at least one of the following conditions — anemia, decreased physical function, low vitality, impaired cognition or reduced sexual function — will be randomly assigned to participate in a treatment group or a control group. Treatment groups will be given a testosterone gel that is applied to the torso, abdomen, or upper arms; control groups will receive a placebo gel. Serum testosterone will be measured monthly for the first three months and quarterly thereafter up to one year. Participants will be tested on a wide range of measures to evaluate physical function, vitality, cognition, cardiovascular disease, and sexual function.

“This study is important because testosterone products have been marketed for many years as treatments for a variety of conditions,” said Evan C. Hadley, M.D., director of NIA’s Division of Geriatrics and Clinical Gerontology, which is the primary funder of the trial. “”We hope this trial will establish whether testosterone therapy results in clear benefits for older men.”

The University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine is the lead institution for the trial and will serve as coordinating center for the study sites. Peter J. Snyder, M.D., professor of medicine in the Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism at Penn, is the principal investigator and will oversee trial activities. “This is an unprecedented opportunity for older men to learn more about themselves and at the same time help find out if testosterone will improve some of the afflictions of old age,” said Dr. Snyder.

Recruitment of study participants will begin in November of 2009. Men age 65 and older who are interested in participating should call the site closest to them. Men living within a 50-mile radius of the study centers, listed below, are especially encouraged to participate.

Participating institutions and their phone numbers include:
University of California, Los Angeles; 310-222-5297
University of California, San Diego; 877-219-6610
Boston University; 617-414-2968
University of Pittsburgh; 800-872-3653
Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, N.Y.; 718-405-8271
Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas; 713-798-8343
University of Minnesota, Minneapolis; 612-625-4449
Yale University, New Haven, Conn.; 203-737-5672
University of Alabama at Birmingham; 205-934-2294
VA Puget Sound Health Care System and University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle; 206-768-5408
Northwestern University, Evanston, Ill.; 877-300-3065
University of Florida, Gainesville; 866-386-7730, 352-273-5919

January 11, 2010

Radiation After Surgery Lowers Chances of Melanoma Recurrence

Filed under: Health — Tags: — admin @ 3:36 am

Patients whose melanoma has spread to one or more lymph nodes face a decreased risk of the deadly skin cancer returning if they have radiation treatment following the removal of the nodes, a new Australian study shows.

In a paper to be presented Monday at the American Society for Radiation Oncology annual meeting in Chicago, lead researcher Dr. Bryan Burmeister, a radiation oncologist at Princess Alexandra Hospital in Brisbane, reported the hopeful findings from the five-year study.

“Results of this trial now confirm the place of radiation therapy in the management of patients who have high-risk features following surgery for melanoma involving the lymph nodes,” Burmeister said in a news release. “In some institutions, radiation treatment is routine protocol, while in others, the protocol has been either for patients to just be observed or receive some type of adjuvant chemotherapy or immunotherapy. I encourage patients with melanoma to talk to their doctors about whether radiation should be added to their treatment plan.”

External beam radiation involves the use of a beam (or beams) of radiation directed through the skin to the cancer and the tissue in its immediate vicinity. This targeted radiation destroys the tumor while helping to mop up nearby cancer cells that might remain after surgery. The therapy is usually painless and performed on an outpatient basis.

Burmeister’s study followed 217 patients with melanoma, a deadly skin cancer, between 2002 and 2007. All had at least one lymph node removed after doctors determined that the cancer had spread into the nodes. The surgery, called a lymphadenectomy, is standard treatment for metastasized melanoma.

About half the patients underwent postoperative radiation treatment, while the other half followed-up with their physicians to see if their cancer had returned. By the end of the study, 19 percent of the radiation patients had experienced a local nodal relapse of their melanoma, compared with 31 percent of patients who did not undergo postoperative radiation treatment. Overall survival was not affected, however.

Melanoma starts in the melanocytes, which are cells found in the top layer of skin that are responsible for producing the pigment melanin. Melanoma can arise anywhere there is pigmented tissue, including the eyes, sinuses, anus and a woman’s vulva.

According to the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York City, skin melanomas often look asymmetrical, have a ragged or blurred border and are dark in color. But rare forms of melanoma contain no pigment and can appear as pink nodules on the skin.

The disease is less common than other skin cancers, but if untreated, melanoma can spread and be difficult to cure. In the United States, more than 67,000 people annually are diagnosed with melanoma, and more than 8,000 will die, according to the American Cancer Society.

Given the severity of the disease, U.S. melanoma experts said they found the study intriguing.

“This is the first randomized study that tested the question whether postoperative radiation therapy offered any advantage in terms of loco-regional control to patients with loco-regionally advanced melanoma,” said Dr. Nancy Lee, a radiation oncologist at Memorial Sloan-Kettering. “The authors are to be congratulated for finally completing an important study in our field. This is particularly important as [local] recurrence can be devastating and often is difficult to salvage with additional therapy.”

Dr. David Fisher, of Boston’s Massachusetts General Hospital, praised the study but said he wanted more data on overall survival.

“This is an important study, since decisive data on the value of adjuvant radiation therapy have been lacking,” said Fisher, director of the melanoma program at Mass General. “It will be important to learn additional details, but the study appears to provide important supportive evidence for adjuvant radiation therapy.”

Powered by WordPress