Meds

March 28, 2010

Marijuana, Alcohol Addiction May Share Genes

Filed under: Health — admin @ 12:44 pm

The genes that make people susceptible to alcoholism also make them prone to becoming addicted to marijuana, a new study suggests.

Researchers interviewed almost 6,300 men and women aged 24 to 36, including almost 2,800 sets of twins who were part of the Australian Twin Registry, about their use of alcohol and marijuana over their lifetime.

Twins are valuable to researchers in determining the role of genetics in various diseases or conditions because identical twins share 100 percent of their genes, while fraternal twins share 50 percent of their genes, the same as other siblings.

About 60 percent of the likelihood of becoming a heavy drinker, a frequent marijuana user or of becoming dependent on marijuana can be attributed to genes, according to the study, while about half of the likelihood of being an alcoholic can be traced to genetics.

“We know there is a high likelihood of alcohol addiction-related problems among people who smoke marijuana heavily and vice versa,” said study author Carolyn E. Sartor, a research instructor at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis. “What we found is that some of the same genetic influences that impact alcohol use and dependent symptoms also impact marijuana use and dependent symptoms.”

Still, that means between 40 percent and 50 percent of the cause of alcohol or marijuana dependence may be due to environmental influences. Despite a genetic tendency, no one is predestined to abuse either substance, Sartor noted.

And even though a common set of genes appear to influence marijuana and alcohol addiction, there are also likely specific genes that influence addiction susceptibility to individual substances, Sartor added.

The study will be published in the upcoming March issue of Alcoholism: Clinical & Experimental Research.

Marijuana is the most commonly used illegal drug, according to the study, citing a 2008 survey that found about 42 percent of high school seniors reported having tried marijuana. About 5 percent said they had used it daily during the previous month.

Though generally believed to be less addictive than nicotine in tobacco products, about 12 percent of marijuana users meet the criteria for dependency, according to the study. Symptoms of marijuana or alcohol dependency include using more heavily or more frequently than intended, giving up important activities to smoke or drink and building a tolerance or needing to use more to get the same effect.

Marijuana’s active ingredient, THC, acts on the brain’s cannabinoid system, which is involved in learning, memory, appetite and pain perception, explained Dr. Christian Hopfer, an associate professor at the University of Colorado School of Medicine. Medical uses for marijuana including alleviating pain and boosting appetite in people with cancer and other serious illnesses.

But marijuana has its downsides. Other research has shown marijuana use increases the risk of developing mental illnesses, Hopfer added.

Far less research has been done about marijuana than on tobacco or alcohol products, Hopfer said. That needs to change. Not only is marijuana use widespread, but THC levels in pot have increased in recent years, making the drug’s effects more potent.

“We are quasi-legalizing it due to medical marijuana, yet we really don’t know that much about it except a lot of people are self-administering it,” Hopfer said. “Marijuana addiction is a subtler addition than with some other drugs, but it can be a big focus of their life and interfere with their functioning.”

In the past, researchers have often studied the addictive properties of drugs such as tobacco, cocaine, marijuana, heroin and alcohol separately, Hopfer said. But studies such as this suggest there can be similar genes underlying a propensity toward many types of substance abuse.

“There is a lot of evidence that if you have trouble with one substance you will have trouble with others,” Hopfer said. “Twin data shows that the genetic effects may be across substances.”

While there are legal drugs available to help treat nicotine and alcohol addiction, there are no drugs to treat marijuana addiction. For marijuana dependency, behavioral modification, family therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy and 12-step programs are among the programs that may help, Hopfer said.

March 21, 2010

Hangover impairs judgment in young adults

Filed under: Health — admin @ 12:43 pm

It’s not enough to “sleep it off” after a night of drinking.

According to a study released today, the effects of intoxication last long after the booze is out of the blood, not only leaving a nasty hangover but also slowing reaction times and the ability to concentrate the next morning.

Rhode Island and Massachusetts researchers found that it didn’t matter whether the liquor consumed was clear or dark; the level of brain impairment was the same the next morning.

“People will be impaired the morning after – after the alcohol leaves the system,” Dr. Damaris Rohsenow of the Brown University Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies in Providence, Rhode Island noted in a telephone interview with Reuters Health.

The findings are based on a study looking at the effects of heavy drinking on 95 young adults between the ages of 21 and 33. The subjects spent two nights at the Boston test facility. One night they were given alcohol (either vodka or bourbon mixed in cola) and the other night they were given a placebo. The researchers determined their blood alcohol levels, sleep patterns and ability to think quickly and over a long period of time.

To approximate the effects of drinking on an empty stomach, Rohsenow and colleagues gave test subjects a standardized meal three hours before the test liquids were given until subjects reached a minimum blood alcohol level of 0.09 grams percent. (In all 50 states, 0.08 grams percent is considered legally drunk.)

Previous research shows that symptoms of a hangover (headache, nausea, sleepiness) usually lift within a few hours of waking. While this study did not measure how long impairment lasted, Rohsenow told Reuters Health: “It’s likely that the performance effects probably lift within a few hours,” too.

Vodka and bourbon appear on each extreme of alcohol purity: vodka is the most free of impurities while bourbon has the highest level – all other alcohols are somewhere in between.

Previous research shows that the higher the impurities the lousier a drinker is likely to feel the next day, but this study showed that impairment was the same.

“Bourbon versus vodka didn’t make a difference; the biggest thing was the alcohol itself,” Rohsenow said.

Subjects given alcohol the night before “thought their ability to drive a car was as good as or better” than those who were administered placebo, Rohsenow said.

It “might be a good rule of thumb (to) wait until they don’t feel so lousy the next morning before doing any activities that might involve operating dangerous equipment,” Rohsenow said.

The researchers chose to study young adults because there are more heavy drinkers among this age group, it’s safer, and they have more time to devote to the overnight stays required by the study. As a result, the findings can only be applied to people between the ages of 21 and 33.

March 14, 2010

Post-Surgery Infection Can Add $60,000 to Hospital Bill

Filed under: Health — admin @ 12:40 pm

Surgical patients whose incisions become infected with antibiotic-resistant bacteria are at greatly increased risk for hospital readmission and death, claims a new study that found that treating this type of infection can cost as much as $60,000 per patient.

Duke University Medical Center researchers examined the 90-day postoperative outcomes of 659 patients. Some had surgical site infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), some were infected with methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), and others had no infection.

“We found that patients with surgical site infections due to MRSA were 35 times more likely to be readmitted and seven times more likely to die within 90 days compared to uninfected surgical patients,” lead author Dr. Deverick J. Anderson, an infectious diseases specialist, said in a news release. “These patients also required more than three weeks of additional hospitalization and accrued more than $60,000 in additional charges.”

The study also found that patients with MRSA averaged six more days of hospitalization and $24,000 more in additional hospital charges than those with MSSA. However, the researchers were surprised that those infected with MRSA didn’t have a higher risk of death than those with MSSA.

“For the seven hospitals we looked at, the total estimated cost resulting from surgical site infections due to MRSA was more than $19 million. That’s a staggering amount, which demonstrates an area of cost-saving potential for these institutions and other community hospitals,” Anderson said.

February 26, 2010

Recent Cancer Screening Changes Leave Many Confused

Filed under: Health — Tags: — admin @ 9:22 am

The world of cancer screening has been upended in the past two weeks.

Not only did the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) just raise the age at which it recommends women get their first mammogram from 40 to 50, but the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologists (ACOG) decided that adolescents should be spared the inconvenience and possible risks of cervical cancer screening, and wait until they reach the age of 21 for such testing. Both groups also recommended screening less frequently.

Add to that the long-simmering debate on the value of PSA testing for prostate cancer and the fact that both the American Cancer Society (ACS) and the American College of Radiology have condemned the new USPSTF recommendations, it’s no wonder patients and even experts feel like they are suffering from a bad case of medical whiplash.

Was the timing of the announcements anything more than coincidence? Are the changes a reflection of new science, attempts to influence the current raging health-care debate or just medical business as usual?

The timing, by most accounts, was purely accidental.

“I think it’s a coincidence that this [the mammogram recommendation] came out when it did, right in the middle of the health-care reform discussion. It’s a good panel, one that was dedicated to getting the right answer to what should be done about this,” said Dr. Robert J. Barnet, senior scholar in residence at the Center for Clinical Bioethics at Georgetown University, in Washington, D.C.

Added Dr. Jay Brooks, chairman of hematology/oncology at Ochsner Health System in Baton Rouge, La: “This is nothing new. Cancer screening guidelines have been changing as more scientific knowledge accumulates.”

And much of the new knowledge does suggest that over-screening does happen, often resulting in false-positive results, which lead to more biopsies and more angst. This is true of breast, cervical, prostate and other forms of cancer, experts concur.

“There’s appropriate screening and there is the appropriate population that should be getting that screening, and there is the appropriate screening interval,” said Dr. Otis Brawley, chief medical officer of the American Cancer Society. “We can violate all of those things.”

Meanwhile, false-positive results from mammographies are more common in younger (age 40 to 49) women than in the upper age bracket. And the age cut-offs for screening may be artificial.

“We like to lump people into big decades of life, so the risk of a 40-year-old woman and the risk of a 49-year-old woman [for breast cancer] are different,” Brooks noted. “The risk at 40 is much less than the risk at 49.”

“Younger women are at higher rates of false-positives, which results in more biopsies, more procedures being done and women getting callbacks for extra mammograms,” he added. “This creates anxiety for something that’s not anything bad.”

Also, there’s increasing evidence that some cancers will never turn into anything dangerous and, therefore, don’t warrant treatment.

“Our definition of cancer was given to us by German pathologists in the 1840s after they looked at biopsies from autopsy specimens,” Brawley explained. “Now, 170 years later, we’ve progressed in terms of imaging, in terms of medical diagnostics into what I call the genetic and molecular biologic age, but our ability to define cancer has not progressed beyond the light microscope. What we need to be able to do eventually is say that ‘this cancer is never going to progress,’ it is not going to spread and invade other organs in the body. But right now we don’t have the molecular tools to predict their behavior.”

“Not only do we need to find small tumors, we need to know more about the biology of those tumors,” added Dr. Michael V. Seiden, president and CEO of Fox Chase Cancer Center in Philadelphia.

Until those tools are developed, imperfect screening is going to lead to over-diagnosis and unnecessary treatment.

Still, there’s no question that the revisions do fit into a larger and rapidly changing health-care picture.

“Where I think the question was solely focused on ‘can you prevent cancer death?’ … 10 years ago or 20 years ago, I think there has been a much more open dialogue about the burden of screening, the cost burden, the anxiety burden, the false-positive burden,” Seiden said. “As screening techniques become more sensitive, you do a better and better job of capturing people with cancer but you also do a better job of capturing people with tumors they might not have died from. So, all of a sudden the incidence of pre-malignant breast disease, the incidence of low-grade prostate cancer, starts doubling and the death rate drops, but only very, very modestly.”

While the USPSTF stated that cost considerations had nothing to do with the new breast cancer recommendations announcement, ACOG did mention costs in its announcement regarding changes to cervical cancer screening.

“In this country, health care is an enormous issue and it is the single greatest driver of the national debt,” Brooks said. “There’s nothing wrong with raising financial questions in a public health setting.”

“It’s my belief that the task force just set the date [for its announcement] and wasn’t really paying attention to the politics. In truth, I don’t know but . . . part of the way of controlling costs is the rational use of medical care, not the rationing of care,” Brawley said. “For most women in the U.S., to get a Pap smear on an annual basis means that we’re going to spend three times more on cervical cancer screening than we need to spend and we’ve actually gotten evidence that screening tests every five years is going to save as many women as every three years [but] we’ve gone every three years to be safer.”

According to Brawley, ACOG’s new cervical cancer guidelines “look amazingly” like the 2002 American Cancer Society guidelines.

The ACS does not agree with the new USPSTF guidelines for breast cancer screening, however.

“Our view is that breast cancer screening saves lives and women aged 40 and above should get a high quality mammogram and clinical breast exam on an annual basis,” Brawley said.

Ochsner Health System’s Brooks is not changing his advice to women. “I tell women at age 40, if she wants to begin screening with mammography, it’s fine,” he said. “I haven’t changed what I’m recommending in my practice but I try to explain to women what the rationale behind it is.”

February 22, 2010

Smokers Double Their Risk for Heart Disease

Filed under: Health, Heart — Tags: — admin @ 9:21 am

A new study offers yet more proof that smoking is a major risk factor for death from heart disease and cancer.

Researchers followed 12,152 American and European male and female smokers, formers smokers and nonsmokers for three years. During that time, current smokers were 4.16 times more likely to die of cancer, 2.26 times more likely to die of heart disease and 2.58 times more likely to die from any cause than were former or nonsmokers. Current smokers were also more likely to suffer a heart attack or stroke.

There were no significant differences between former smokers and nonsmokers in the risk for dying from heart disease or any cause, but former smokers were more likely to die of cancer than those who’d never smoked.

“The analysis provides further strong evidence that people with heart disease who continue to smoke take a very high risk of increasing their chances of death in the short term,” principal investigator Dr. Deepak L. Bhatt, chief of cardiology at the Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, said in a news release from the American Heart Association.

“This study provides impetus for a smoker to stop,” he said. “The benefits of risk reduction accrue relatively quickly when someone stops smoking, although the lingering cancer risk is still there.”

January 31, 2010

How long does hepatitis B vaccine protection last?

Filed under: Health — Tags: , — admin @ 2:53 am

The hepatitis B vaccine – given to protect against infection by a virus that can cause severe liver damage and cancer – may protect for more than two decades, according to a new study.

In 1981, Dr. Brian J. McMahon, from the Alaska Native Medical Center, Anchorage, and his colleagues gave more than 1500 Alaska Native adults and children over age 6 months three doses of hepatitis B vaccine. Before the hepatitis B vaccine was licensed for U.S. use in 1981, as many as one in 12 Alaskan Natives were infected.

In 2003, the team checked with almost 500 of those given the shots and had a response to them at the time to see who was still showing evidence of an immune system response. Blood tests found that more than half – 60 percent — were still considered immune to the virus.

To test whether the other 40 percent were immune, they were given a booster dose of the vaccine, to simulate infection. Most of those people – more than 80 percent – showed a response.

Overall, the researchers estimate that more than 90 percent of the original group was protected. There were no long-term hepatitis B infections in the group, which also suggests a high level of protection, they note in a report in the Journal of Infectious Diseases.

They conclude, “in light of the strong evidence we present here, hepatitis B vaccine booster doses are not currently indicated.”

January 25, 2010

Nicotine Patch Plus Lozenge Best for Quitting Smoking

Filed under: Health — Tags: , — admin @ 2:51 am

The first head-to-head comparison of different quit-smoking products finds that a nicotine patch combined with a nicotine lozenge had the most success.

More than other methods, including antidepressants, this combination best mimics the actual highs and lows of smoking to help smokers kick their habit, experts said.

“The study shows that, yes, one therapy came out on top, the patch and the lozenge [together],” said Dr. Jonathan H. Whiteson, co-director of the Joan and Joel Smilow Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention Center at NYU Langone Medical Center in New York City.

“The reasoning behind it is that the patch supplies a steady supply of nicotine replacement and the lozenges give a boost of nicotine which you can use when you have an extra craving. It gives people control,” said Whiteson, who was not involved in the research.

“If you combine these different types of nicotine replacement you’re going to get the best bang for your buck,” added Megan E. Piper, lead author of the new study and an assistant professor at the Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention at the University of Wisconsin, Madison. “But also remember that in this study people got a lot of counseling. It was that combination that resulted in a 40 percent quit rate [at six months out].”

In fact, coupling the patch with the lozenge was the only intervention that performed better than a placebo, reported the study, which appears in the November issue of the Archives of General Psychiatry.

The study adds insight to a field that’s long suffered from too little research. “As each medication comes out, it is tested against a placebo,” but not against other methods, Piper explained. “There just hasn’t been the funding or the availability of a program to do something like that.”

This research was funded by the U.S. National Institutes of Health. Medication was provided free by drug maker GlaxoSmithKline. Several of the study authors reported financial ties to different pharmaceutical companies.

For this study, 1,504 adults who had smoked at least half a pack a day for the past six months and wanted to quit were randomly assigned to a placebo or one of five different quit-smoking interventions: nicotine lozenge, nicotine patch, bupropion (Wellbutrin, an antidepressant), nicotine patch plus nicotine lozenge, and bupropion plus nicotine lozenge. All groups received six individual counseling sessions with a case manager.

The nicotine patch, which has been available for more than two decades, is currently the most widely used pharmacotherapy to help people quit smoking.

However, only the combination of the nicotine patch and the lozenge performed significantly better than placebo six months after the person smoked their last cigarette, the team found.

People taking the patch-lozenge combination were also more likely to have sworn off cigarettes after one week and were more likely to have attained one full day without smoking, the researchers said.

The 40 percent (at six months) success rate reported here will decline as time goes on, Whiteson noted. He added, however, that in the smoking cessation arena, “even the 30 percent range is very good.”

Another expert said the study raised some key concerns. “The question is, how many of them had to continue on the lozenge in order to stay off cigarettes? I always tell people not to do the lozenge alone because it mimics the very thing that smoking does, which gives you a spike. Then, when you reach a trough, you pick up a lozenge — or cigarette,” said Dr. Len Horovitz, a pulmonary specialist with Lenox Hill Hospital in New York City. “Once they stopped everything, could they do without the spikes and troughs [of the lozenge], which mimics physiologically everything the cigarette is doing? Smoking is a two-pronged problem. There’s nicotine dependence and a behavioral aspect to it.”

Dr. Elliot Wineburg, assistant clinical professor of psychiatry at Mount Sinai School of Medicine in New York City, felt the study suffered from some limitations, namely lack of individual attention to individual smokers’ habits.

“The authors said that they gave the patients lozenges according to the company’s [instructions],” he said. But this doesn’t take into account how much people smoke or how strong their cigarettes are. “They don’t even look into the amount of nicotine a person takes.”

January 11, 2010

Radiation After Surgery Lowers Chances of Melanoma Recurrence

Filed under: Health — Tags: — admin @ 3:36 am

Patients whose melanoma has spread to one or more lymph nodes face a decreased risk of the deadly skin cancer returning if they have radiation treatment following the removal of the nodes, a new Australian study shows.

In a paper to be presented Monday at the American Society for Radiation Oncology annual meeting in Chicago, lead researcher Dr. Bryan Burmeister, a radiation oncologist at Princess Alexandra Hospital in Brisbane, reported the hopeful findings from the five-year study.

“Results of this trial now confirm the place of radiation therapy in the management of patients who have high-risk features following surgery for melanoma involving the lymph nodes,” Burmeister said in a news release. “In some institutions, radiation treatment is routine protocol, while in others, the protocol has been either for patients to just be observed or receive some type of adjuvant chemotherapy or immunotherapy. I encourage patients with melanoma to talk to their doctors about whether radiation should be added to their treatment plan.”

External beam radiation involves the use of a beam (or beams) of radiation directed through the skin to the cancer and the tissue in its immediate vicinity. This targeted radiation destroys the tumor while helping to mop up nearby cancer cells that might remain after surgery. The therapy is usually painless and performed on an outpatient basis.

Burmeister’s study followed 217 patients with melanoma, a deadly skin cancer, between 2002 and 2007. All had at least one lymph node removed after doctors determined that the cancer had spread into the nodes. The surgery, called a lymphadenectomy, is standard treatment for metastasized melanoma.

About half the patients underwent postoperative radiation treatment, while the other half followed-up with their physicians to see if their cancer had returned. By the end of the study, 19 percent of the radiation patients had experienced a local nodal relapse of their melanoma, compared with 31 percent of patients who did not undergo postoperative radiation treatment. Overall survival was not affected, however.

Melanoma starts in the melanocytes, which are cells found in the top layer of skin that are responsible for producing the pigment melanin. Melanoma can arise anywhere there is pigmented tissue, including the eyes, sinuses, anus and a woman’s vulva.

According to the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York City, skin melanomas often look asymmetrical, have a ragged or blurred border and are dark in color. But rare forms of melanoma contain no pigment and can appear as pink nodules on the skin.

The disease is less common than other skin cancers, but if untreated, melanoma can spread and be difficult to cure. In the United States, more than 67,000 people annually are diagnosed with melanoma, and more than 8,000 will die, according to the American Cancer Society.

Given the severity of the disease, U.S. melanoma experts said they found the study intriguing.

“This is the first randomized study that tested the question whether postoperative radiation therapy offered any advantage in terms of loco-regional control to patients with loco-regionally advanced melanoma,” said Dr. Nancy Lee, a radiation oncologist at Memorial Sloan-Kettering. “The authors are to be congratulated for finally completing an important study in our field. This is particularly important as [local] recurrence can be devastating and often is difficult to salvage with additional therapy.”

Dr. David Fisher, of Boston’s Massachusetts General Hospital, praised the study but said he wanted more data on overall survival.

“This is an important study, since decisive data on the value of adjuvant radiation therapy have been lacking,” said Fisher, director of the melanoma program at Mass General. “It will be important to learn additional details, but the study appears to provide important supportive evidence for adjuvant radiation therapy.”

December 13, 2009

Task Force Finds Insufficient Evidence for Screening for Newborn Jaundice To Prevent a More Serious Chronic Condition

Filed under: Health — admin @ 9:14 am

According to a new recommendation from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, there is insufficient evidence to assess the balance of benefits and harms of screening infants for hyperbilirubinemia to prevent chronic bilirubin encephalopathy. Hyperbilirubinemia is a condition marked by a high level of bilirubin in the blood, which is often apparent as yellow-colored skin and eyes (jaundice). This recommendation and the accompanying summary of evidence will appear in the October issue of Pediatrics.

About 60 percent of all infants have jaundice, and it generally clears up without any medical treatment. Some infants are more likely to have severe jaundice and higher bilirubin levels than others. In some infants, hyperbilirubinemia may lead to chronic bilirubin encephalopathy, a rare but devastating neurological condition. The brain damage associated with chronic bilirubin encephalopathy, or kernicterus, may result in cerebral palsy, auditory processing problems, gaze and vision abnormalities, and cognitive problems. The number of children who develop chronic bilirubin encephalopathy is unknown and difficult to determine.

“There is inadequate evidence that screening all full-term and near-term infants for elevated bilirubin leads to improved health outcomes,” said Task Force Chair Ned Calonge, M.D., who is also chief medical officer for the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment. “More research is necessary to understand how often chronic bilirubin encephalopathy occurs, its risk factors, and whether screening is associated with a reduction in chronic bilirubin encephalopathy.”

There is evidence that screening using risk factor assessment or bilirubin level measurement can identify infants at risk of developing hyperbilirubinemia, but there is no known screening test that will reliably identify all infants at risk of developing chronic bilirubin encephalopathy. Not all infants with chronic bilirubin encephalopathy have a history of hyperbilirubinemia, and not all infants who have extremely high levels of bilirubin develop chronic bilirubin encephalopathy.

In assessing the potential benefits and harms of screening infants for hyperbilirubinemia, the Task Force looked for evidence that screening reduced the number of new cases of chronic bilirubin encephalopathy. No studies have directly addressed whether screening, either risk-factor assessment or bilirubin testing, reduced the number of new cases of chronic bilirubin encephalopathy. The current evidence on screening has evaluated the effectiveness of screening to identify infants for treatment intended to reduce high levels of bilirubin.

The Task Force found that the evidence is currently insufficient regarding whether treating infants with high levels of bilirubin results in fewer children developing chronic bilirubin encephalopathy. There is a critical gap in the evidence regarding the relationship between screening infants without symptoms of hyperbilirubinemia and the desired outcome of reducing cases of chronic bilirubin encephalopathy. When the Task Force finds insufficient evidence to make a recommendation, it does not mean a clinician shouldn’t provide a service but that the evidence is lacking, and if a service is offered, patients should understand the uncertainty about the balance of benefits and harms. The Task Force recognizes that clinical or policy decisions involve more consideration than their recommendations alone, and clinicians and policy makers should understand the evidence but individualize decision-making to the specific patient or situation.

Efforts have been made by clinicians to eliminate this rare disorder by applying measures to screen for and aggressively manage high bilirubin levels. Universal screening for jaundice is widespread in the United States, and clinicians and parents should continue to work together to decide whether to screen in the face of insufficient evidence. Clinicians must remain aware that screening and resulting treatment of hyperbilirubinemia have potential harms such as weight loss, gastrointestinal problems, and disruption of the mother-infant bonding.

The Task Force is the leading independent panel of experts in prevention and primary care. The Task Force, which is supported by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), conducts rigorous, impartial assessments of the scientific evidence for the effectiveness of a broad range of clinical preventive services, including screening, counseling and preventive medications. Its recommendations are considered the gold standard for clinical preventive services.

The recommendations and materials for clinicians are available on the AHRQ Web site at http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/uspstf/uspshyperb.htm.

December 7, 2009

When Pounds Go, Sleep Apnea May Improve

Filed under: Health — admin @ 3:13 pm

People with sleep apnea who are also obese may triple the chances of eliminating their sleep problems by losing weight, a new study suggests.

Losing about 10 percent of their body weight was enough to bring on total or near-total remission, said Gary Foster, head of the Center for Obesity Research and Education at Temple University in Philadelphia, and lead author of the study.

“It’s been clear that obesity increases the risk of sleep apnea but less clear that if obese people or people with type 2 diabetes lost weight, it would result in significant improvements in their sleep apnea — and it did,” said Foster.

People who are overweight or obese are much more likely to have obstructive sleep apnea, a condition in which a person’s breathing stops or becomes very shallow, sometimes several hundred times a night and sometimes for as long as a minute, according to the American Sleep Apnea Association.

“The soft palate in the back of mouth falls down and blocks the airway,” said Dr. Mitchell Roslin, chief of bariatric surgery at Lenox Hill Hospital in New York City. “When you get to people with serious levels of obesity, it’s virtually impossible to find those without [this type of] sleep apnea.”

The condition can lead to cardiovascular problems, including stroke, and can raise the risk for dying prematurely.

“It really has tremendous detrimental effects on the cardiovascular system,” Roslin said.

The study involved 264 obese men and women who also had type 2 diabetes and obstructive sleep apnea. They were randomly assigned to an intensive behavioral program intended to encourage weight loss or to a less intensive set of group sessions that mainly addressed the issue of diabetes management.

After a year, those in the intensive program had lost an average of about 24 pounds, compared with slightly more than a one-pound average weight loss for the others.

Those who lost the weight also saw a substantial reduction in the number of sleep apnea episodes they experienced, with more than three times as many people in the intensive group experiencing complete remission (13.6 percent versus 3.5 percent).

“The greatest benefit was seen in men and those with severe apnea,” Foster said.

Any amount of weight loss brought on an improvement, but those who lost about 10 percent of their original body weight saw the greatest effect. “Any weight loss is good,” Foster said.

Most experts recommend 10 percent as the weight loss needed to improve sleep apnea.

However, the study also found that people whose weight remained stable experienced a worsening in their sleep apnea. Just why that occurred remains unclear.

“This is one of the first and certainly the largest study ever conducted so we’re at the point in the field, unfortunately, where we’re just describing the effect,” Foster said.

The study, published Sept. 28 in the Archives of Internal Medicine, does seem to confirm what common sense and experience have shown.

“We’ve seen that when patients gain five to 10 pounds, their sleep apnea is much worse. If they lose five to 10 pounds, the sleep apnea is much better,” said Dr. Hormoz Ashtyani, director of pulmonary critical care and sleep medicine at Hackensack University Medical Center in New Jersey. “It’s usually not a resolution, but it’s a significant improvement.”

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress